THE BATTLE STARTS AT 18:30 GMT


planning fights
discussing battlefields

What is this gay crap


It's a proper war, Shako.

When Should We Fight?

Looks like we ( PPA and the mouse in his pocket )'ve settled on 20:00 CEST (18:00 GMT) for the time of the battle. Preparations will begin a few hours earlier.

We settled on next weekend as the date of the battle, but haven't decided on a day or time yet. Please enter here when you are available and could come; time in CEST unless otherwise noted:

  • P_P_A and June: Saturday 15:00–24:00, Sunday 15:00–24:00
  • Sidmarcus01: Saturday 14:00–19:00, 23:00+, Sunday 21:00+
  • Hino: Any time on Saturday around 7PM GMT.
  • Enderian people: Any time on Saturday around 7PM GMT.
  • Battkhort people: Any time on Saturday around 7PM GMT.
P_P_A when Ender calls him out that they didn't agree on 18:00 GMT
08:29:09         @PPA | you know what? Since you're going to treat me the same either way, I'll just decree in my position as mod and political officer that the battle will  │
               │                      | start at 6:30 PM GMT                   

Where Should We Fight?

Click to display ⇲

Click to hide ⇱

I say some place that isn't in the middle of nowhere and isn't boring. We're itching for some place like Bydlograd or Siverny. — hino 2015/10/19 09:17

Siverny isn't part of the COM, and it doesn't make sense for the very first battle to already take place in enemy heartland in Bydlograd (the second battle could, though). For the first battle I would suggest a border region such as this or this.

It makes no sense for the first campaign where we're the aggressors to occur in our territory. This is already going to be a snoozefest where we slap you guys around like last time then get banned. At the very least, we want to set off some fireworks in Bydlograd instead of leaving craters in the sticks. — hino 2015/10/19 10:04

Ok, Bydlograd is fine. Where should we set up our bases? Commonwealth inside of the city, Ender at the fringes/just outside? [15:25:35] <austro> maybe one side starts in the reichsrat and the other in the city hall

We, the attackers, could have a fortification ( removed after the battle ) and the defenders could be inside. That sounds fine. — hino 2015/10/19 22:31

Okay.

The battle will take place in Nova Bydlograd. Ender will take positions south of the river, the Commonwealth forces will station themselves in the north. The exact locations will be disclosed to the combatants by their respective leader(s).

How Should We Fight?

Rules for the battle:

  • allow TNT
  • allow breaking glass and stuff with bare hands
  • allow looting of chests
  • ban pickaxes, shovels, axes, and other tools
  • ban placing lava with buckets during the battle
  • ban locking death chests
  • ban setting a home during the battle (everyone needs to set their main unnamed /home in their faction's base before the battle)
  • ban placing blocks during the battle, except for TNT, redstone-related stuff, and repairs</del> no it wont, have ypur gay buttsex somewhere else

The Rules in Russian

  Разрешено:
  - Использовать динамит
  - Ломать блоки голыми руками
  - Забирать предметы из сундуков, включая лут игроков
   
  Запрещено:
  - Использовать инструменты(лопата, кирка, топор)
  - Использовать ведра лавы во время боя(ловушки с лавой разрешены)
  - Приватить сундуки на поле боя
  - Прописывать себе спавн на поле боя за пределами базы
  - Ставить блоки после начала боя(исключение - динамитные пушки)

Regarding Kriegstein

The Republic of Ender has declared war on the Crown of Kriegstein, which is in clear violation of the Treaty of Castile, which Kriegstein has truthfully observed.

The Republic of Ender earlier stated that it considered itself no longer bound to the aforementioned treaty as the Kingdom of Kriegstein, the other party of the agreement, has dissolved into settlements and is no longer a political nation.

These two positions are contradictory. The King of Kriegstein, ruler of Nouvelle Reims, asks for clarification whether the Republic of Ender:
- deems the Kingdom of Kriegstein to be a political player as it continues to act as such (despite the lack of nation status), in which case the Republic of Ender would still be bound to the Treaty of Castile, or
- it considers the Kingdom of Kriegstein truly dissolved, and any of its former settlements' political bolstering to be null as per their lack of nation status, in which case the Republic of Ender is to consequentially revoke its declaration of war on a state that does (for the purposes of nationplay) not exist.

Signed, S.M. le roy P_P_A I de Kriegstein


None of the provisions in the Treaty of Castile are violated. The decision to dissolve it as an entity was your own. As you have dissolved it, are the Republic of Ender is obliged to guarantee the sovereignty and integrity of the individual settlements of Kriegstein. As you have dissolved Kriegstein as a nation, it cannot claim land which it cannot use, allowing anyone to squat on it. Our actions protect their integrity. I'm not really sure what this has to do with the Commonwealth, however, as it is not a party of the Treaty of Castile, which would instead be covered by the Treaty of Somerset. — hino 2015/10/16 01:12


As kreigstein has been formally disolved all lands thereof become the personal holding of ppa, any action to take these lands is a clear violation of international law and will be counted as such by the rightous peoples of this server.

-Shakomatic XVII von Bydlograd


No Shako, they become the personal holdings of whoever established/built them (except during Sidmarcus01's absence, his personal settlements fell to me, but those weren't annexed).

To the Republic of Ender:
Given your valid stance on the events that have unfolded, your declaration that the Kingdom of Kriegstein—whose dissolution you acknowledge, as you have just reiterated—“must be brought to justice” is nonsensical; as is your call for the abolition of the monarchy of Kriegstein.
Given that it has already abolished itself from nationplay (and exists as but a ceremonial title), and is thus outside of the realm within which the Republic of Ender can dispense “justice”, your statement evokes the impression of a declaration of war upon the ancestral settlements of the House of Kriegstein that host the remnants of the royal court.
If your declaration was merely a retroactive explanation for your annexation of the former lands of Kriegstein, We kindly request clarification of this.

I do not see why you bring up the Commonwealth, for it is entirely irrelevant to this particular matter.

Signed, S.M. le roy P_P_A I de Kriegstein


The text you mention was from a previous incident whereby Breshik is attempting to claim Siverny and the King of Kriegstein discussed ceding territory to the Commonwealth where the Republic had interests opposed to both positions, thus making it a third beliegerent party in this Sivernian incident.

Seeing are you are the one who added my previous statement to this page, you might want to ask yourself how it is relevant to this. — hino 2015/10/16 11:05


Given that it sounded like a declaration of war upon Breshik, it seemed relevant to this conflict. If it is not, I apologise for my mistake of adding the statement to this page, and appreciate that you have removed it.
For the record, “the King of Kriegstein [discussing] ceding territory to the Commonwealth” pertained only to Siverny, which was never part of the Kingdom of Kriegstein (or Ender), and refers to trivial private conversations between Sidmarcus01 and my person about a possible future for the island as a large capital city of some kind.

Signed, P_P_A as whatever


Shako, the Commonwealth has been given countless opportunities in order to remedy its actions and refuses. You are not exempt from this. We have been very lenient and stated that we are willing to accept 100 emeralds and that you no longer grief this apolitical settlement: http://i.imgur.com/2pjsJBt.png . You have refused. The declaration stands and we should treat the Commonwealth as it has treated the Republic of Ender. Attempting to hide our declaration of war does not change this. I can understand that you do not wish for your holdings to be at risk, but this is precisely the situation that your actions have lead this to. There could have been a peaceful resolution, but it is clear that is not what you, PPA, or Austro want. We are willing to give you your war. — hino 2015/10/16 22:27


Removed the bloat from the article by hiding all the correspondences under spoiler tags. t. P.P.A.


I never have and never will care about your opinion hino. -Sincerly shako

Then stop trembling from it and trying to hide the declaration, faggot. — hino 2015/10/16 23:25

Editing on my phone, sorry it automatically deletes redundant bullshit


Second Battle of the War, Changes in Battkhortostan/Ender Organization

There have been changes in the organization and leadership of Battkhortostan/Ender that are yet to be reflected on the wiki, any decisions regarding the war must go through me before becoming official for Battkhortostan/Ender.

We can schedule the battle for January 3rd or 10th (someone requested a Sunday and many of us have less responsibilities to attend to at this time). The time is yet to be determined but will likely be around afternoon/evening Europe and morning/noon North America. We are on the defense this round.

This war looks to be promising and we look forward to the second battle.

Sikandar 2015/10/28 13:35

Noone of us is willing to wait more thenthan 2 months for a battle. -Austro

That's nice. — hino 2015/10/29 01:44
  • talk/battles/2nd_com-ender_war.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/11/08 04:02
  • (external edit)